Re: [council] Verisign Agreement

[Vany Martinez <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Hi Erica, and all:

Personally I think that this document raises concerns that I think many 
people amongst NC and constituencies (if not, please correct me).

Is there anything else the Names Council or any constituency can do in 
order that ICANN Board accepts the DNSO propose changes?
If yes, then this letter is a good place for begin plus all the positions 
that all constituencies sent to the Board previously.
If not, then we have to begin to work in all the subjects on the New 
Agreement that are pertaining to DNSO.  We have to begin inmediatly in 
order to not be surprised again!!!

Cheers
Vany



At 01:42 p.m. 04/10/01 +1000, Erica Roberts wrote:
>Registrars continue to express concern about the proposed new Verisign 
>Agreement and have asked me to pass on to the NC  a penultimate draft of a 
>letter to ICANN from th Registrars constituency seeking additional changes 
>in the agreement (attached).
>
>Regards,
>erica

Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
a member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency of the 
ICANN's DNSO
e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax:  (507)  230-3455