RE: [council] Revised draft NC position on verisign

[Michael Schneider <sastre@anwalt.de>]

Theresa,

I appreciate your alternative draft. However - isn't the DNSO and ICANN at 
large expecting us to come back with something "real" (at least this time) 
rather than to provide a statement which is diplomatically ballanced to an 
extent where the Board is finally left alone with it's own considerations ?

Michael

At 17:05 27.03.01 -0500, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>Philip, all,
>
>First, thank you for the preparation of the draft version 2 resolution for
>discussion on tomorrow's NC call. After reading the resolution, and reading
>exchanges on it, I have a few thoughts about the resolution reflects and how
>it summarizes the views of the different constituencies (or differing views
>of constituencies). Would it not be better to have a short executive
>statement, something such as the following:
>
>"Pursuant to the Melbourne ICANN Board resolution 01.22, the DNSO Names
>Council forward to the ICANN Board the following comments on the substantive
>merits of the ICANN/Verisign amendment [list comments annexed]. In summary,
>comments reflected a variety of views, with the key areas relating to
>[list]. These issues should be taken into consideration by the Board."
>
>In the current proposed draft resolution, it would seem to me that the
>points contained in section 'C' could be included in issues to be considered
>by the Board (in second sentence in suggested para. above). It's my
>understanding that the choice is between option A or B (unless I've missed
>something) Do others have a different understanding?
>
>Anyway, this is just a suggestion, as I'm not sure from all the exchanges
>the NC will have agreement on the current resolution as drafted given the
>different constituency views (or differing in views, and extent to which
>they prevail over option a or b).
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Theresa
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
>Philip Sheppard
>Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:06 AM
>To: NC (list)
>Subject: [council] Revised draft NC position on verisign
>
>
>Following some feedback please find attached v2 of a draft NC position on
>Verisign.
>Changes from v1 are highlighted using the Word tracking function. We will
>use v2 as the base document for discussion tomorrow March 28.
>
>Philip Sheppard