DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Independent Review NomCom Appointments - REQUEST FOR ACTION

Fine with me.
However, I am confused since I thought Louis said that this was a temporary
assignment along the lines of six months since once they nominate the Panel,
their job is done.  Why do they need such long terms?

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:01 AM
To: DNSO Council (Public archive)
Subject: [council] Independent Review NomCom Appointments - REQUEST FOR

you will recall that we agreed to appoint Scott Hemphill (US) and Olivier
Iteanu (France) to the nomination committee for the independent review
panel. Apparently to ensure continuity the committee has initial terms of
office of different length and we must appoint a three year and a two year
term. Scott Hemphill has indicated he is willing to serve three years and I
propose that we appoint him to the three year term and Olivier Iteanu to the
two year term.
Please let me have your approval or comments on this latest midnight in your
time zone Monday 5 February 2001. 
If there is no disagreement I will inform ICANN of this decision. If there
is disagreement we will discuss it at a February telephone meeting but I
would prefer to not return to this item if possible.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>