ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls


I have no problem with change in time.



------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: "Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl>
Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
Date: 12/15/2000 09:25am


I have no problem.

Saludos

Guillermo

-----Mensaje original-----
De: kstubbs@digitel.net [mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net]
Enviado el: Viernes, 15 de Diciembre de 2000 05:07 a.m.
Para: aus der Muhlen, Axel; 'Elisabeth Porteneuve'
CC: council@dnso.org
Asunto: Re: [council] Time of Nc calls


i have no problem with this schedule change but would appreciate input 
from
other council members in the next 24 hours

ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
To: "'Ken Stubbs'" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
<IMCEAMAILTO-Elisabeth+2EPorteneuve+40cetp+2Eipsl+2Efr@mpaa.org>
Cc: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:04 PM
Subject: FW: [council] Time of Nc calls


>
> I, again, request that the next conference call on December 19 be
scheduled
> for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast.  As  indicated in my previous email,
scheduling
> the call for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast ensures that during Northern
Hemisphere
> winter time everybody is within the 06.00  - 23.00 window 
recommended by
the
> Intake Committee.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aus der Muhlen, Axel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:15 PM
> To: 'Philip Sheppard'; council@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
>
>
>
> I believe that can be achieved also during Northern Hemisphere 
winter
time.
> Note that I suggested to schedule the conference call for 4:00 p.m. 
US
East
> Coast, thus 1:00 p.m., not 6:00 a.m., California.
>
> If the conference call is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast, the
> corresponding local times would be as follows:
>
>                 California, USA                           1:00 p.m.
>                 Missouri, USA                             3:00 p.m.
>                 Monterrey, Mexico                      3:00 p.m.
>                 Washington DC, USA                4:00 p.m.
>                 St.Thomas, Virgin Islands          5:00 p.m.
>                 Santiago, Chile                           6:00 p.m.
>                 Buenos Aires, Argentina            6:00 p.m.
>                 Nouakchott, Mauritania              9:00 p.m.
>                 London, United Kingdom           9:00 p.m.
>                 Brussels, Belgium                    10:00 p.m.
>                 Barcelona, Spain                      10:00 p.m.
>                 Frankfurt, Germany                   10:00 p.m.
>                 Paris, France                             10:00 p.m.
>                 Seoul, Korea                                6:00 
a.m.
>                 Tokyo, Japan                               6:00 a.m.
>                 Melbourne, Australia                   8:00 a.m.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Sheppard [ mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be
> <mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be> ]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:36 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Subject: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
>
> In reply to Axel's request to re schedule the NC call to a more 
socialble
> hour in California (currently 5.00 am), Axel referred to the Intake
> Committee suggestion in the report adopted by the NC that call 
should
> ideally be scheduled to be no earlier than 06.00  and no later than 
23.00
in
> any time zone.
>
> I am afraid to say that the Intake Committee was guilty of operating 
on
> Northern Hemisphere summer time, where the 06.00 - 23.00 window is
> achievable between California and Melbourne.
>
> Unfortunately the combination of winter time in the Northern 
Hemisphere
and
> Melbourne daylight saving time, means the window is wider in 
Northern
> Hemisphere winter months. The consequence of shifting to 06.00 in
California
> is now 01.00 in Melbourne.
>
> I think the 06.00 - 23.00 window should indeed be an objective but 
clearly
> we need to operate differently during some months of the year. 
Apologies
> that the Intake Committee had not foreseen this problem earlier.
>
> Philip.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>