Re: Re: [council] Review Working Group

[Michael Chicoine <mchicoine@pol.net>]

I disagree



------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr>
Subject: Re: [council] Review Working Group 
Date: 12/02/2000 10:24pm


on 2/12/00 21:58, Peter de Blanc at pdeblanc@usvi.net wrote:

> Fellow NC members:
> 
> 
> A suggestion was made that the WG submit a "proposed charter" to the 
NC for
> ratification prior to undertaking its work.
> 
> I submit that it would be impossible to even gather ideas and 
discuss such a
> charter, without an operating list for those persons who wish to, or 
are
> willing to participate.
> 
> Given the absence of any clear policy as may have been output by 
working
> group "D", It seems that the only way to move forward with the YJ 
WG-F is to
> turn on the list.
> 
> The WG was voted upon and approved in a public meeting. Any delays 
could
> provoke a negative public reaction.
> 
> Does anyone on the council disagree with the necessity of activating 
the
> list now?
> 
> Peter de Blanc
> 
-
I fully agree with the request to activate the list as soon as 
possible, and
certainly before the NC meeting of December.
Dany
-
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------