ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting


Ken,
Experience has shown that already 9:00 is a difficult start time, with an
almost empty room.
Maybe ICANN/IANA/ccTLD are willing to meet at sunrise ;>).
RG


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@revenue.com]
> Sent: Monday, 25 September 2000 21:55
> To: GAETANO, Roberto; council@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting
> 
> 
> so was our names council meeting  last time roberto. maybe 
> you would wish to
> start your meeting at 8am or 8:30 am ?
> 
> any other suggestions
> 
> 
> best wishes
> 
> ken
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>
> To: <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; <council@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 2:48 PM
> Subject: RE: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting
> 
> 
> > Philip,
> >
> > In Yokohama we finished well after 12:30, with people 
> leaving before the
> > vote of the last motion, because it was too late and they 
> wanted to get
> > something to eat (which I did not manage to do) before the 
> NC meeting at
> > 13:00.
> > Maybe the dialogue was not meaningful for your standard 
> ;>), but it took
> > more than three hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Roberto
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
> > > Sent: Monday, 25 September 2000 9:24
> > > To: names council; GAETANO, Roberto
> > > Subject: Re: [council] proposed schedule for november 
> icann meeting
> > >
> > >
> > > Ken and Paul,
> > > the proposed schedule:
> > > November 13th NC dinner
> > > November 14th -Tuesday 9am -noon -  general assembly
> > > 1pm thru 4 pm -names council
> > >
> > > sounds fine to me. Count me in for the dinner.
> > >
> > > By copy to Roberto, I recall the we struggled to get
> > > meaningful dialogue at
> > > a previous GA meeting, do you have an agenda that will
> > > inspire and requires
> > > 3 hours ? If so well and good but lets not commit to 3 hours for a
> > > lacklustre meeting if we can have a good one in half the
> > > time. Your call
> > > Roberto.
> > >
> > > Philip.
> > >
> > >
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>