DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proxies

philip & all...

here is what i wrote kathhryn....

"i think we have a problem with this. it is my understanding that you cannot
appoint a "temporary " representative to the council. this surfaced after
milton mueller and paul kane were appointed as "temporaray members"   few
meetings ago.

it is my understanding currently that you can give your proxy to another
names council rep but you cannot appoint a temporary .."

I do not believe that any constituancy can appoint temporty representatives
to the council. my guess is that appointment
would probably be in conflict with by laws on all sides.

unless we receive specific  instructions to the affirmative from the ICANN
staff, i do not believe we can accomodate this
procedure of temporary appointments

if you have any other questions on this please i feel that you should bring
them up with either andrew or

best wishes


----- Original Message -----
From: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
To: <KathrynKL@aol.com>; <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [council] Proxies

> Ken and NC members,
> Could we have your views rapidly on Kathy's request to appoint a proxy who
> is not a member of the NC?
> As you know I am not able to attend Yokohama and have for the present
> appointed Theresa as proxy. However, if we believe that is is important to
> have full representation (as Kathy says) I am ready to appoint another BC
> member instead.
> Philip

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>