RE: [council] Please make comments on

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

Ken,

That is a good point. Agree to take it off the agenda. 

Theresa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@corenic.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:01 AM
> To: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com; council@dnso.org; YJ Park
> Subject: Re: [council] Please make comments on
> 
> 
> 
> i personally feel that a names council meeting is NOT the 
> place to provide a
> forum for those who are not satisifed with a previous 
> decision. the issues
> were discussed and a vote was taken. if any individual or constituancy
> wishes to lobby for or against a previous names council 
> decision the best
> forum for this is by e-mail to any of the relevent lists or 
> directly to
> ICANN board members. You are also aware that the GA and the Board also
> provide time at their respective open meetings for public advocacies &
> comments by individuals and constituancies as well
> 
> if we provide time and a podium for one person or 
> constituancy to lobby &
> advocate then it would be incumbent on us to provide equal time for
> rebuttals or additional constituancies to do the same. This would
> significantly diminish the time available for us to become 
> more informed on
> and act on other issues such as the "global outreach" and "developing
> countries perspective".
> 
> i personally recognize that there will always be parties or 
> constituancies
> who may not be happy with each and every names council 
> decision but our
> meetings are not intended to be used as opportunities for "public
> advocacies" on specific issues.
> 
> as such and based on further elaborations provided by the 
> proposer, i do not
> feel it is appropriate for this specific item #4 to be placed 
> on the agenda.
> 
> ken stubbs
> 
> 
> >
> > > # 4: I am a little confused about the scope, and large 
> amount of time
> > > allotted to this topic. I think that this is something that may be
> better
> > > addressed by a Task Force. I volunteer to come to the NC 
> meeting in
> > Yokohama
> > > with a proposal outlining this suggestion. I know it's an 
> issue that
> > Working
> > > Group D has also been made aware of.
> >
> > Thank you for your volunteer.
> > However, if we can make a time slot for those who want to 
> appeal against
> > NC's recommendation to the ICANN Board, it would be more reasonable.
> >
> 
>