[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[council] WG-B report, end of three weeks public comments
Dear Names Council members,
As you recall from the last teleconference, the WG-B Formal Report
was open for three weeks public comments, starting 19 April 2000,
ending 10 May 2000 (yesterday), see details in:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20000419.NCwgb-comments.html
Yesterday the NC received one request for extension of time from the NCDNH.
All public comments received to comments-wgb@dnso.org are archived in:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-wgb/Arc00/maillist.html
As of today CET early morning, 85 comments were received, see names
of senders and the subjects below.
A review and compilation of these comments is necessary prior
to the next NC teleconference, foreseen on 17 May, I believe
it remains within Chair's and Co-Chair's prerogative.
I am cc'ing Michael Palage.
Best,
Elisabeth
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. [comments-wgb] Feedback, Working Group B
* From: "Jim Fellers" <jf55115@wt.net>
2. [comments-wgb] TM and a Domain Name (Are they the same?)
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
3. [comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
4. No Subject
* From: Mihm Michael W <MihmMichaelW@JDCORP.deere.com>
5. [comments-wgb] Trademark Owners Rights/Cyber Squatters
* From: "SS Steve Scharf (1368)" <Steve.Scharf@amgreetings.com>
6. [comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20
* From: "J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>
7. [comments-wgb] ServiceMaster Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
* From: Douglas_W._Colber@svm.com
8. [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus Twenty proposal
* From: "Ron Greigg" <rgreigg@ix.netcom.com>
9. [comments-wgb] (no subject)
* From: Jose Gomez-Marquez <jose@home.com>
10. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: "Serge Hadji" <Serge.Hadji@trw.com>
11. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: "Sandi L Colello" <Sandi.L.Colello@trw.com>
12. [comments-wgb] Domain names
* From: "Lies, Otto R." <Otto.R.Lies@sgcna.com>
13. [comments-wgb] Response to Sunrise Proposal
* From: "Juan Roberto Gonzalez" <jgonzalez@swlaw.edu>
14. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
* From: Brinton Scott <BScott@dentonwildesapte.com.cn>
15. [comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks (2)
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
16. [comments-wgb] Objection to "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal
* From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>
17. [comments-wgb] Definition of "Famous" and Expansion of Mark Holders' Rights Should Be Carefully Limited
* From: Robert Szarka <szarka@downcity.net>
18. [comments-wgb] *Sunrise Plus Twenty*
* From: "Palmer, Lynne" <Lynne.Palmer@ecolab.com>
19. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: druckmr@nytimes.com
20. [comments-wgb] ICANN - Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
* From: "Jeanne E Oneill" <jonei2@jcpenney.com>
21. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: Steve Price <srprice@pacbell.net>
22. [comments-wgb] Comments to Sunrise+20 Proposal
* From: "Gundelfinger, Anne" <anne.gundelfinger@intel.com>
23. [comments-wgb] AIPLA Comments to Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
* From: "Jonathan Hudis" <JHUDIS@oblon.com>
24. [comments-wgb] INTA Comments on WG-B
* From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>
25. [comments-wgb] ATTENTION: I Believe something is afoul here....Please Read...
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
26. [comments-wgb] Forget sunrise - dnso as trademark police?
* From: "Ken Cowan" <kccowan@starpower.net>
27. [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty
* From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>
28. [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty
* From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>
29. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Pluse Twenty
* From: "Shannon Gallagher" <gallaghers@PENNIE.COM>
30. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
* From: "Hallie, Michelena" <Michelena.Hallie@viacom.com>
31. [comments-wgb] support the Sunrise
* From: "Rose, Nick" <npr@ffwlaw.com>
32. [comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise" proposal
* From: Jeff Fisher <jeff@jeffenstein.org>
33. [comments-wgb] .WEB (important)
* From: flex@holonet.net
34. [comments-wgb] I oppose "Sunrise + 20".
* From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
35. [comments-wgb] What happens to TM holders with the same name, but different class of goods or s
* From: "greg krajewski" <udomain@mailcity.com>
36. [comments-wgb] I am opposed to "Sunrise Plus Twenty"
* From: "Blair P. Houghton" <bph@primenet.com>
37. [comments-wgb] Afternic.com Members Forum Please add my name to the list
* From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>
38. [comments-wgb] .Web
* From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
39. [comments-wgb] ICANN has no mandate for the Sunrise +20 rule
* From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>
40. [comments-wgb] I oppose Sunrise + 20
* From: David Schutt <david@speco.com>
41. [comments-wgb] Fwd: .WEB (please read)
* From: DNSO Webmaster <DNSO.Webmaster@dnso.org>
42. [comments-wgb] The Realistic .Web
* From: "hawk" <first2web@alltel.net>
43. [comments-wgb] .web WILL replace the dying .com's...it's a fact...get over it..
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
44. [comments-wgb] position on the issues
* From: "Judith Oppenheimer" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>
45. [comments-wgb] The not so Famous Marks
* From: Jack Landrum <jlandrum@consultant.com>
46. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: rwhoke@mmm.com
47. [comments-wgb] RE: New TLD's considered
* From: Whirlwindjr@aol.com
48. [comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B
* From: "Anthony Galimberti" <Anthony@EnterpriseSolutionProviders.on.ca>
49. [comments-wgb] Response to Working Group B Formal Report
* From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
50. [comments-wgb] gTLD's
* From: "Nick Cunningham" <nick_cunningham@wragge.com>
51. [comments-wgb] Intellectual Property Constituency's proposal to ICANN about trade marks and the new gTLDs
* From: "Andrew Margiotta-mills (FCHD)" <andrew.margiotta-mills@freethcartwright.co.uk>
52. [comments-wgb] "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
* From: "Huguenin,Charles-AndrŽ,VEVEY,FC-JUR/TM" <Charles-Andre.Huguenin@nestle.com>
53. [comments-wgb] We support Sunrise Plus 20
* From: KHS@de-vi.com
54. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Proposal Plus Twenty
* From: "David Moyer-DM" <moyer.dm@pg.com>
55. [comments-wgb] Support for "Sunrise + 20" Proposal
* From: "M.J.P. Deans" <mjpdeans@btinternet.com>
56. [comments-wgb] Trademark Protection is the responsiblity of the court system!!
* From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
57. [comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal
* From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>
58. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision
* From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>
59. [comments-wgb] Why bother with the obsolete legacy roots anyway?
* From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <bthornton@jointtech.com>
60. [comments-wgb] Working Group B Report
* From: Stu Benson <sbenson@farkaslaw.com>
61. [comments-wgb] Support of Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: "Ettinger, Patrice" <Patrice.Ettinger@dowjones.com>
62. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: "Patricia Hoet" <PHoet@hpcd-abogados.com>
63. [comments-wgb] Interesting - non-commercial Constituency Position Paper
* From: "Loh Shin Shion" <ssloh@ew.mimos.my>
64. [comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20-proposal
* From: kuntze@boehmert.de
65. [comments-wgb] Comments on the WG-B (Famous and Well-known Marks) Report
* From: azkubo@interlink.or.jp
66. [comments-wgb] RE:Comments about the WG-B Report
* From: KMPA4244@jpo-miti.go.jp
67. [comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20 is good, but . . .
* From: "Peter Gustav Olson" <pgo@ipb.dk>
68. [comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B
* From: "Anthony Galimberti" <anthony@enterprisesolutionproviders.on.ca>
69. [comments-wgb] test
* From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>
70. [comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20
* From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>
71. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
* From: "Michael K. Kirk" <Mkirk@aipla.org>
72. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus twenty proposal
* From: "Peter Broadbent" <pbroadbent@cblaw.com>
73. [comments-wgb] FW: Sunrise Plus 20
* From: "Boulware, Margaret A." <MBoulware@jenkens.com>
74. [comments-wgb] Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
* From: Neal Greenfield <neal.greenfield@imagelock.com>
75. [comments-wgb] MPA comments on the WGB Formal Report - support for sunrise
* From: "Shapiro, Ted" <Ted_Shapiro@MPAA.org>
76. [comments-wgb] Legality of Sunrise: A Response
* From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>
77. [comments-wgb] Sunrise 20 Proposal
* From: dianne.harrington@kodak.com
78. [comments-wgb] On the creation of new gTLDs
* From: Seann Hallisky <Halliss@cojk.com>
79. [comments-wgb] Time Warner Inc.'s Comments Regarding Sunrise Plus Twenty Pro posa l
* From: "Wilson, Dennis L." <DWILSON@KMWLAW.COM>
80. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision
* From: "Candido, Domna" <candido@MajorLeagueBaseball.com>
81. [comments-wgb] On the Sunrise Proposal
* From: Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>
82. [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
* From: "Andrew Gray" <graya@PENNIE.COM>
83. [comments-wgb] Support to "very limited" sunrise period.
* From: Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>
84. [comments-wgb] Comments to Working Group B Report
* From: DBUSH2@aol.com
85. [comments-wgb] Words First
* From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
------------------------------------------------------------------------