[council] new language for resolution

[KathrynKL@aol.com]

We are now seeing some of the tremendous controversy around the WG-B report. 
It is very important to the integrity of our process -- and to make all in 
the DNSO feel heard -- that we put the 4-17 WG-B Report out on public notice 
and hold any resolution on its content (including all IP issues) until the 
end.

I propose that all WG-B/IP language be removed from the resolution and the 
following language added:
==> As mandated by the Board resolution, we are hereby passing to you the 
WG-B status report of mid-March.   This status report was the work of Michael 
Palage alone and summarized the position papers and the debates within the 
working group before Cairo.  In Cairo, we, the Names Council, by resolution 
gave WG-B four weeks to wrap up its lengthy deliberations and present us with 
a report of any consensus items and proposals it had at that time.  
Yesterday, we received the Formal Report of WG-B.  We will now follow our 
procedures, put the WG-B Report out on public notice and comment, and will 
send to you by mid-May the Formal WG-B Report, our summary of its comments 
and any resolution we pass regarding its recommendations. 

sorry for the late posting,
kathy