[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [council] suggested draft resolution for today's NC call
Therefore we should at least prepare 2-3 alternatives with all of their
advantages and disadvantages. This does not have to be a long paper (the
Board could just as well read the WG-C report and I bet some have even done
so ;-) >>
I agree with Michael, as I understand his comments. I think the role of the
Names Council is to hold a public comment period, and then review and
summarize the comments, and any realistic alternatives and options they
provide. That is our "value added" -- to include with the WG report the
comments and views of the entire DNSO and our views (as NC).
BTW, I think our report should really apply only to WG-C. WG-C was a formal
report; WG-B was only a status and informal report. Today, WG-B has a formal
report which is ready to go out on public notice for public comments. When
this comment period is finished, then, as with WG-C, the NC should write a
report as well.