Re: [council] IANA Report on the .pn Top-Level Domain

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Dennis wrote:
> 
> ccTLD Colleagues,
> 
> Please see below a message from Loius Touton of ICANN on the proposed change of
> delegation of the .pn Pitcairn Island ccTLD.  Please let me have any comments
> you may have so that I may advise the Names Council of the ccTLD Constituency
> views.
> 
> On the basis of the information presented in the report, the proposal to
> re-delegate seems reasonable to me.  
> 
> However, it would seem appropriate that the new ccTLD Manager be required to
> sign up to ccTLD Best Practice as part of the re-delegation process (see the
> separate message on the CENTR Best Practice Guidelines for ccTLD Managers).
> 
> Dennis

==> According to the root and NSI database, the change has already
    taken place -- the .PN has been updated on 11-Feb-2000.

    whois -h whois.networksolutions.com "handle PN5-DOM"

    The DNSO GA was discussing about, see for exemple:
        http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01454.html
        http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01471.html

    Elisabeth

> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] IANA Report on the .pn Top-Level Domain
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:29:06 -0800
> From: Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>
> To: council@dnso.org
> 
> To the Names Council:
> 
> Today the IANA is issuing a report on the 1997 request of the 
> Pitcairn Island Council that the delegation of the .pn domain 
> be changed.  A copy of the report appears at 
> <http://www.icann.org/general/pn-report-11feb00.htm>.  The report 
> concludes, based on existing ccTLD policy as set forth in 
> ICP-1 <http://www.icann.org/icp/icp-1.htm>, that the delegation 
> should be changed.  ccTLD delegation and administration policies 
> are on the agenda for the March 9 public forum in Cairo.
> 
> Louis Touton
>