RE: [council] FW: WGC Straw Vote

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

Working Group D has been working towards a proposal with regards to WG C. I
just note that it has been discussing the resolution (as inevitably was
going to occur) and working towards a proposal since the day (or day after)
the resolution was passed. Please note that it's not in anyone's interest to
have WG-C go out of business, etc. We should really try to have a functional
solution, and that's what WG-D is trying to work towards.

The wg-d lists are archived, so even though one isn't participating, one can
see the archives to get a sense where things stand.  It is the intention of
both of the co-chairs (I've copied Brett who is the other chair for WG-D) to
make sure WG-D accomplishes it's job.

Theresa

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
Raul Echeberria
Sent:	Thursday, September 02, 1999 11:26 PM
To:	Chicoine, Caroline; 'council@dnso.org'
Subject:	Re: [council] FW: WGC Straw Vote

>Raul, I am not suggesting that WGC go out of business or that it cannot
>continue its dialogue.  What I object to is the production of proposals
>(like Jonathan's recent Compromise Proposal") or voting before WGD has
>produced interim measures.

I understand you now, and I could agree with you in this point. But....
I think that the most important is the work in working group D.

We asked WG-D to have some outcome in two weeks since the NC resolution.
It was 8 days ago. What did WG-D do in those days ?. Any news about it ?
I'm not in the WG-D but I would like to know some news in advance ...

Best Regards.



Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy