[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [council] Re: Votes of the NC

To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Votes of the NC
From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:27:58 +0200
CC: council@dnso.org
References: <199907291709.TAA20679@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

Elisabeth PORTENEUVE wrote:
> 
> Amadeu answered:
> > > I have a very simple voting procedure to suggest you for
> > > the immediate usage (WGA).
> > > We need to agree on the following:
> > >   1. Electorate (in the case of WGA, Amadeu are you refering
> > >      the voting members of the pNC -- am I correct ?)
> >
> > Yes,
> >
> Amadeu et al,
> 
> Is my understanding correct that the gTLD constituency is
> allowed 3 votes until the modification of ICANN Bylaws

Right. And I think your list is perfecly correct.

Amadeu

References:
- Re: [council] Re: Votes of the NC
  - From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [council] Re: Votes of the NC
Next by Date: [council] WG-A Final Report and voting
Prev by thread: Re: [council] Re: Votes of the NC
Next by thread: [council] WG-A Final Report and voting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread