[agenda] RE: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

I am not imposing a majority. I am just saying (personally), as a NC
member, if there was a "ground swell" of consensus about a new GA chair,
I would be inclined to move to action on the NC.

Certainly 1, or 2, or even 5 persons agreeing with WXW is not a "ground
swell", rough consensus, or anything like it.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Dassa
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:30 PM
To: ga@dnso.org; agenda@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair


|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]On Behalf

|> Of Peter de Blanc
|> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:37 PM
|> To: 'Joanna Lane'; 'Jeff Williams'; 'Joop Teernstra'; 'Paul M. Kane';

|> 'Philip Shepard'
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org; agenda@dnso.org
|> Subject: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair
|>
<snip>
|> If the GA wishes a new chair, it can decide that on its own. And to 
|> me, that means at least 51% of the persons who have posted to the GA 
|> list in the last 3 months would need to express such a desire.
<snip>

For the GA to do anything it needs an effective Chair.  That is one of
the issues and why the item is on the agenda one would assume.  It would
also be presumptive to impose a majority vote on such an issue in the
GA.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html