DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] FYI - ALAC discussions on 15 days issue

A new data point. 

I think that we may be misintrepreting wht the present requirement is. 

Let's get the ICANN staff to tell us what the present obligation is.. 

I've cc'd Louie and if he can just online explain what the present obligation is, we can work from there.

Thanks, all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:23 PM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-whois] FYI - ALAC discussions on 15 days issue

On 2003-01-31 00:51:22 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> For your information, there has been some discussion of the 15
> days issue on the At-Large Advisory Committee.  While the
> committee does not have any formal statement at this point of
> time, the discussion shows consensus on the Committee that 15
> days are not enough time for responding to accuracy inquiries.

Let me clarify this for the record: Only some of the members of the
ALAC actually participated in that discussion, so there is, at this
point of time, no formal consensus of the entire committee.

Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>