DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....

All - I think we should start with whatever we can get from ICANN.  I'm not
yet clear on whether that's 100 for all of us to review (ok), or 100 each
(even better).  I am not arriving in LA until very late Sunday so a Monday
meeting is best for me - perhaps a working lunch?  Regards, Miriam

Miriam Sapiro
Director of International Policy

VeriSign, Inc.
1666 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington DC 20006
tel:    202-973-6600
fax:   202-466-9103
cell:  703-282-7117
email: msapiro@verisign.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Harris [mailto:harris@cabase.org.ar]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; 'YJ Park (MINC)'; Paul M. Kane; WHOIS
Committee - DNSO
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....


I anticipate being on site on Saturday 11/10 early
in the day.

Tony Harris
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
Para: "'YJ Park (MINC)'" <yjpark@minc.org>; "Paul M. Kane"
<Paul.Kane@reacto.com>; "WHOIS Committee - DNSO" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
Enviado: Domingo 7 de Octubre de 2001 12:36
Asunto: RE: [nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....

> Folks, let's think about what our request is and what modifications may be
> needed to the schedule once we get the data.
> I know we can all by annoyed about the delay, but that isn't very
> productive. Instead, let's see if we can come up with a strategy which
> allows us to get some review done, once we get the data.
> I suggested a possible "sample" of perhaps a small number before (maybe we
> all read the same 100 and come up with our agreed to framework and format?
> -- it's only one idea and I would welcome other suggestions --I didn't see
> any response from anyone on that suggestion.
> Let's see if we can do a little online thinking about how we can proceed
> check schedules for MdR meetings, etc in the next few days.
> Like Y.J., I've got a full plate with various meetings and want to be sure
> that I give sufficient time to this issue as well.
> Y.J. merely raising the issue that we are awaiting data from Louie doesn't
> help to address our need to continue planning on what we will do once we
> the data. I am not objecting to updating the NC that we don't have the
> but do you have some thoughts along the lines of what I proposed which we
> could, as a Committee discusss online so we can offer a suggestion for how
> we will proceed? Your response to that or some other ideas from anyone
> would be very helpful.
> Also, given that 11/12 is tied up already for constituency meetings, and
> perhaps the NC, can we also check feasibility of coming in in time to meet
> before:
> Y.J., your schedule will be pretty challenging, given other commitments
> have:
> I can probably arrive Saturday for a p.m. meeting -- what about others?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJ Park (MINC) [mailto:yjpark@minc.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 2:35 AM
> To: Paul M. Kane; WHOIS Committee - DNSO
> Subject: Re: [nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....
> Whois Committee members,
> Due to no response from Louis yet with repect to Paul's request
> made on Oct. 5th, this issue should be raised during the coming
> NC teleconference. Since this TF was formed, this TF has been
> awaiting the data collected by ICANN.
> Your comments will be appreciated regarding this matter.
> Thank you,
> YJ
> > Hi Louis
> >
> > Here's another request for the WHOIS data from the recent DNSO Survey...
> > in the formats we have already discussed.
> > I appreciate you and your staff are busy but we need the data in order
> > to stay on our fairly tight schedule for evaluating the submissions and
> > producing the interim and final report.
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Paul
> >

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>