DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] The review process?????

Dear Paul and other Members - I think it's a wise idea, as Paul suggests, to
check first with ICANN on how they would like to provide the info to us.  It
would be helpful if we can divide up review, although exactly how will be
tricky.  I don't think we could divide up survey questions for the excellent
reasons Oscar gave.  Perhaps, though, we could divide the surveys, at least
initially, by response group.  It will be important to see if there are
trends in responses among, e.g., individual users, businesses, IP folks,
registrars, etc.  Regards, Miriam

Miriam Sapiro
Director of International Policy

VeriSign, Inc.
1666 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington DC 20006
tel:    202-973-6600
fax:   202-466-9103
cell:  703-282-7117
email: msapiro@verisign.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@reacto.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:55 AM
To: WHOIS Committee - DNSO
Subject: [nc-whois] The review process?????

As for the review process, I suggest we ask ICANN to sequentially number
each submitted comment so we may collectively refer to each
submission.... and make them available to us via a web site if
possible.  I will ask how they would like to present the information to

The main question is do we divide up the number of submissions between
each committee member to review and draft a report on their "quota" or
as the survey is prepared in sections does each committee member
(working in pairs) review a section or five! Appreciating this review is
long overdue and there may be a tendency to rush to conclusions, it is
very important we take our time to review every aspect of each comment
submitted... Comments/thoughts.....

It would be also be good to arrange a face to face meeting of the
Committee whilst Montevideo. Is any Committee member  _not_ going to
Montevideo?? I will be there from the 6th to the 11.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>