Re: [nc-udrp] Exsistence of Task Force
I can truly understand the delay. I
just saw some postings from Guillermo Carey yesterday that seemed a bit
different than what you have reported below. I will simply await further
information and I appreciate your getting back with me so quickly.
J. Scott Evans
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:43
Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] Exsistence of Task
At Montevideo the Names Council agreed informally
two people to the Task force, one from Peru and another
Malaysia. This was meant to be a minimal change to
address the geographic
concerns while retaining the basic
composition and structure of the Task
(I agree with you) adequately represents the
viewpoints on the UDRP.
That agreement has to be formally
ratified (or not) by email.
The delay/silence you are experiencing is
caused by people's return
from travel, and by the terrorist attack, which
has upset and
distracted many people. I apologize for the delay and
to have some news soon.
>>> "J. Scott
Evans" <email@example.com> 09/12/01
I apologize; however, I am a bit
confused. Where do we stand? I have seen a missive from Phil
Sheppard indicating that the Co-Chairs should move forward. On the other
hand, I have seen several messages regard