RE: [nc-deletes] Time to Vote
I vote for submission.
Internet Law and Policy Group
WorldCom, Inc. (on behalf of the ISPCP)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On
Behalf Of Adam Peake
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:39 AM
To: Tim Ruiz; 'Jordyn A. Buchanan'; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: [nc-deletes] Time to Vote
Then fine by me.
At 7:31 AM -0600 3/21/03, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>I would be Ok with this. Even as is, I am under the impression that
>registrars would be able to note that the fee is subject to change. The
>main point is letting the registrant know to be careful because there is
>a substantial fee associated with recovering a canceled/non-renewed
>name, not that we commit to a price point.
>From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
>Behalf Of Adam Peake
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:09 AM
>To: Jordyn A. Buchanan; email@example.com
>Subject: Re: [nc-deletes] Time to Vote
>Apologies for sending this in late (too late?) A question about
> 3.1.6 Registrars should provide, both at the time of
>registration and in a conspicuous place on their website, the fee
>charged for the recovery of a domain name during the Redemption Grace
>"at the time of registration" -- as names are registered for at least
>a year, is there a risk in asking registrars to commit to a fee so
>far in the future? I think "in a conspicuous place on their website"
>is fine and probably enough.
>At 8:21 PM -0500 3/20/03, Jordyn A. Buchanan wrote:
>>Please find attached the proposed final report. Please vote whether
>>you support transmitting this as our final report to the GNSO council.
>>Please please please try to vote by 2300 GMT tomorrow (that's 1700
>>Thanks all for your hard work
>>Attachment converted: Macintosh:Deletes Final Report.doc (W8BN/MSWD)
>> filename="Deletes Final Report.pdf"
>> name="Deletes Final Report.pdf"
>>Attachment converted: Macintosh:Deletes Final Report.pdf (PDF /CARO)