DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-deletes] Minutes - Conference Call, November 15

Good point. If we wanted to recommend a registry-level re-allocation
solution, we might be sufficiently general about the precise
implementation to give individual registries freedom to license the
Snapnames technology or develop their own solution. I would hope that
the patent isn't so broad that it preempts all possible implementations.

> Presumably any recommendation that WLS be adopted across the board will
> include appropriate notice of whether a license from SnapNames will be
> required.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>