[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga] FW: INEGroup's position on proposed ICANN bylaws changes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 1999 10:00 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: INEGroup's position on proposed ICANN bylaws changes.
> For all,
> From: Jeff Williams, Spokesman INEGroup
> To: Whom it may concern ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board)
> Subject: Proposed ICANN Bylaw changes see:
> In keeping with the principals and requirements of the
> White Paper and
> MoU INEGroup is not in support of any bylaws changes at this
> time. Our
> reasons are as follows:
> 1.) Currently the ICANN has yet to establish a membership, which was
> supposed to be a priority of the ICANN BoD. This priority has
> changed and therefore opens up the ICANN to capture by special
> interests without a proper mandate by the stakeholders
> as required
> in the NTIA's White Paper. We therefore conclude that any bylaws
> changes are not in the best interest of the ICANN (Without a
> and open to detrimental broad impact on the stakeholders.
> 2.) The changes that are proposed by the ICANN BoD would in effect
> permanently exclude or disenfranchise active participation in
> itself unless those stakeholders are members of a SO or
> associated with an SO. As such many if not most
> stakeholders have
> no voice or vote in their own futures or the futures on the
> internet of
> their associated businesses or organizations.
> Kindest regards,
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail email@example.com
> Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208