[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [ga] the DNSO website
As a non-native English speaker ;>), I believe that there is a difference
between "consider" and "approve".
You may "consider" something, and decide not to "approve" it.
THe Board "considered" the application, voted on it, and (unfortunately) did
not "approve" it.
This said, I am with Joop in asking that more publicity on the DNSO Web site
be granted to the efforts in building an individual DN constituency.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 09 September 1999 8:22 AM
> To: Kent Crispin
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] the DNSO website
> Wednesday, September 08, 1999, 11:16:14 PM, Kent Crispin
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:59:00PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> Dear Joop,
> >>> you are not exactly correct :-)
> >>> The Board has _not_ ignored the resolution of the GA.
> >>> The resolution was that the board should _concider_ your
> application again,
> >>> which was done. I was present , as you where.
> >> No, you are not correct, and Joop is.
> >> The board voted to delay consideration (for the second
> time) till the
> >> next meeting.
> > Correction. They considered it enough to delay further
> > until the next meeting. You admit they voted on it -- that
> > constitutes consideration at a fairly significant level.
> If you can't see that voting to NOT consider something is equal to
> practically ignoring it, may I suggest a course in rational and
> logical thought?
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Fax:(209) 671-7934
> Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
> Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
> <IDNO MEMBER) http://www.idno.org