[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ga] Santiago DNSO GA Chair


You wrote:

> The problem is that there is an increasingly frustrated group of
> disenfranchised  Individual Domain Name owners, stakeholders 
> in the DNS,
> who's representatives have *not* been admitted as observers 
> on the NC and
> who will have to wait for the ICANN official blessing until 
> they can fully
> participate and have their representatives vote on the Names Council.
> In the meantime, the NC can pass on recommentations from the 
> WG's to the
> ICANN board
> and determine policy on issues that directly affect these 
> stakeholders.
> Therein lies a problem.
Would this problem be alleviated by participation in the WGs?
I would like to be sure that, while focusing on the needs for extending the
participation, for instance creating and recognizing new constituencies, we
also use the tools that we have for bringing forward ideas and have some
work done.

I see more messages addressing the former topic than the latter.
Therein may lay a problem ;>).