Re: [ga] NC Recommendations
On 2002-04-15 15:24:01 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>I'm not concerned about the issue of "staff support". I am
>questioning the recommendation that the DNSO, ASO, and PSO "should
>remain essentially intact", and should be augmented by a ccSO.
If you have reservations about the substance of Philip's paper, why
did you phrase them in a way which made them sound like reservations
about the process used by Philip? I'd suggest you give a clear
indication of your substantial reservations instead.
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html