DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC Recommendations

On 2002-04-15 15:24:01 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>I'm not concerned about the issue of "staff support".  I am  
>questioning the recommendation that the DNSO, ASO, and PSO "should 
>remain essentially intact", and should be augmented by a ccSO.

If you have reservations about the substance of Philip's paper, why  
did you phrase them in a way which made them sound like reservations 
about the process used by Philip?  I'd suggest you give a clear  
indication of your substantial reservations instead.

Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>