DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] RE: Questions on the draft BC Position Paper

  • To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>, <ga@dnso.org>
  • Subject: [ga] RE: Questions on the draft BC Position Paper
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:15:37 -0400
  • Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
  • Thread-Index: AcHiXbFU+2vqO2LaR+ylYl/9n3g1kgACTW3A
  • Thread-Topic: Questions on the draft BC Position Paper

thanks for asking, Danny. I'll read the questions again that you asked,  and see if I think I can add any value on any of them. I do have some thoughts on the "staffing" and support item and what my experience is in other organizational settings. Perhaps I can start there .. It will be over the week end. I'm headed off for now...

-----Original Message-----
From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:08 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Subject: Re: Questions on the draft BC Position Paper


Thank you for your response.  

I tend to take the view that position papers that are written at a very high 
level of generality do not serve the organization well.   Merely stating that 
a constituency has agreed in principle that there are "things" wrong with 
ICANN, and that ICANN should do "something" about these problems doesn't 
really help that much, does it?

We have less than three weeks to articulate "specific" recommendations to the 
Reform Committee.  If you don't wish to speak on behalf of the BC, I would 
appreciate hearing details and answers to these questions even if they would 
only be your own personal thoughts.  

Perhaps such an exchange of views will stimulate discussion on this forum 
regarding the best way forward on restructuring.

Best regards,
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>