Re: [ga] Evolution - GA
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:28:53PM +0000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>So, while we agree on the assumptions, IMHO these assumptions lead to one of
> the two solutions:
> 1. dynamically correct the constituency structure with a mechanism to
> add/delete/modify the number of constituencies when needed (remember the
> "Paris Draft"?)
>2. get rid altogether of the constituency structure and replace it with a GA
> type structure (Karl Auerbach's solution, identifiable to a certain extent
> with the BWG draft).
There is a third solution: create a constituency with the characteristic
that it has completely open individual membership -- any natural person,
with no restrictions to domain name registrants or anything else. Such
a constituency has the property of providing "representational
closure", and removes, therefore, any requirement of creating more
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html