DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] policy-making options

Kent Crispin wrote:

> > Workgroup C didn't have this problem, and if any subject was going to
> > do that, its the new gTLD subject.
> An occasional exception would not invalidate the general observation.
> And in any case, many would claime that WG-C most certainly did have
> that problem.  I certainly know several interested parties who didn't
> participate.

The operative word here Kent is "didn't". In a TF they "couldn't".

A debate over the time and place for a TF in a bottoms up open and transparent
body, is sickening.
Is this a professional society that the US DoC turned the Internet over to? NO!


This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>