DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA rules?

On 2002-03-29 21:44:29 -0500, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>Does the GA still have rules that stipulate that messages must be 
>relevant to the business of the GA, and that the messages must 
>observe a minimum of decorum, including not indulging in personal 
>attacks or insults?


>The message posted at 
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg00102.html does not 
>appear to be relevant to the GA's business, and decorum seems to 
>be seeking its lowest level.

No complaint has been submitted to the list monitors at 
ga-abuse@dnso.org, as far as I can see this.  If you want to 
complain about a specific message, please do so.

There's no point in publicly complaining about inactivity of the 
list monitor when you didn't even _try_ to draw his attention the 
message in question first.

Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>