DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA rules?

Friday, Friday, March 29, 2002, 6:44:29 PM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Dear List Monitors:

> Does the GA still have rules that stipulate that messages must be relevant to 
> the business of the GA, and that the messages must observe a minimum of 
> decorum, including not indulging in personal attacks or insults?  

> The message posted at http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg00102.html 
> does not appear to be relevant to the GA's business, and decorum seems to be 
> seeking its lowest level.

Much like your messages attacking the integrity of ICANN Board members
and Names Council members?  But that's ok, because it suits Danny's

BTW, as a former chair of the GA, I would assume you know the proper
process for making a complaint to the moderators.  If you have a
problem with my post, then use the process. I stand by what I said.

Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!

This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>