Re: [ga] Abusing consensus in the Transfers TF
At 06:28 28/03/02 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
>Wednesday, Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 8:45:00 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:
> > These are the facts.
>No, they really are just your own opinions.
>You pretty much stood alone on this list on your insistence that the
>bankruptcy clause was inappropriate. And I think you stand alone
>How dare you presume to speak for what is in the best interests of
>registrants anyway. You have no mandate, not even the most flimsy
>claim of a mandate, to do so.
Sure, sure. Individuals have to be kept speaking in isolation.
This is why a registrant organization such as the IDNO , where spokespeople
could be elected by a credible mass of registrants and speak with a proper
mandate, had to be fought tooth and claw for 3 years or taken over.
Just be very cautious in accepting the "mandate" of the supply siders who
now have captured the Individual Domain Name Owners constituency.
Elections for an IDNO ExeCom have now been "set aside".
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html