[ga] Cooperate or Not?
Milton Mueller has submitted the comment cited below to the NCDNHC advising
the Community not to cooperate with the Committee on ICANN Evolution and
Reform. As the GA has two representatives now engaged in discussions with
the Council leadership on restructuring initiatives, what position should the
"I would encourage NCDNHC members not to waste their time submitting comments
to this particular process. The degree to which ICANN will be restructured
is now in the hands of the US Government and wider political forces. A great
deal of behind the scenes activity is underway now; ICANN itself is widely
perceived as a failure.
A Board committee is not the forum in which these decisions should or will be
made. The Board itself, which under the Lynn plan would be able to perpetuate
itself by self-selecting its replacements in perpetuity, has a bit of a
interest in reviewing other proposals, which is why the results of this
particular exercise will not have much significance.
ICANN management and its dominant Board faction has made it clear what it
wants (the Lynn plan). The Board has
indicated that it is willing to ignore its own hand-picked ALSC, which
consumed hundreds of thousands of dollars, and it
is more than willing to ignore the DNSO (.org, .info country reservations,
etc., etc.) Why do you think it will be any
different this time?
I see no reason to expend any effort on this."
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html