[ga] Who wants "governance" without "representation?"
vint cerf wrote:
> Keep in mind that the intent of naming a
> director is NOT to "represent" a particular point of view but to serve
> all of ICANN and the Internet Community to the best of his/her ability.
I question whether that was, indeed, the intent behind the current structure.
Instead, I "understood" that the reason for (s)electing directors from different
stakeholder groups or segments of the community was (as in most governance models)
to assure all interests a seat at the table. As with "beauty," the best interests
of the community are in the eyes of the beholders.