RE: [ga] FW: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
Chuck, you are not seriously implying that the GA consensus answer was a
single-handed action by me, are you ?
the lack of negative comment and the outright support for it may almost
be called unique in GA history, so please..spare me
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:28, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> All the comments that were sent to the firstname.lastname@example.org
> <mailto:email@example.com> address after VGRS' responses to the questions
> were posted.
> I can only assume you did not read the entire document. There was no
> filtering of comments. Please note that the GA comments (Abel's comments)
> were included; in my opinion they were very negative; they were included in
> spite of the fact that no evidence of representativeness was provided.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harold Whiting [mailto:Harold@PeterWhiting.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:46 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
> The Registrar's Constituency's Formal response to the WLS is missing.
> How convenient, for it does NOT support the WLS.
> Also very convenient is the absence of the the expanded discussion over
> whether the registry was contractually allowed to roll out and charge for
> this type of service.
> I do not see this type of service listed in the Registry contract's appendix
> of "allowed" services that the registry could charge for. Neither did
> anyone else.
> Chuck, if you are going to publish only the feedback that is favorable to
> WLS, make it clear that that is what you are doing. As usual, this is a
> blatantly biased posting by VeriSign.
> At 02:09 AM 3/15/2002 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Terry
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:29 PM
> To: 'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org';
> 'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Cc: 'Stahura@enom.com'; Gomes, Chuck; 'email@example.com';
> 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com'
> Subject: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
> To all respondents:
> On behalf of Chuck Gomes, thanks once again for taking time to share your
> comments and feedback concerning the proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS).
> As stated, it has been our goal to aggregate the feedback that is collected
> and post this for public record to the VeriSign website. To that end, we
> have posted to our website the collective feedback that was submitted to
> VGRS, and received at firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com> as of
> 4:30P, March 14, 2002. The URL where these comments regarding the revised
> Wait Listing Proposal may be viewed is at:
> http://www.verisign-grs.com/wls.html <http://www.verisign-grs.com/wls.html>
> . (under the title: "Comments on Wait List Service Proposal")
> Terry Johnson
> VeriSign Global Registry Services
> Harold Whiting
Abel S.H. Wisman
Scottish Provident House
76-80 College Road
+44 20 8424 2422
+44 78 1214 1916
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html