[ga] Re: Input Needed
While policies, plans, and tools (your ICP-5, Registrars Rescue, and online
management method) are important to the equation, what is still lacking is a
channel by which any given interest group can effectively communicate with
the decision-makers on the Board.
Simply declaring SOs as open to any organized "constituency" does little to
ensure that minority views won't be summarily voted down by the entrenched
interests that currently dominate the process.
In my view, the constituency/council structure is at the root of the DNSO's
difficulties. Within the GA, everyone is accorded a voice, all have the
opportunity to vote, and consensus manages to emerge. Would you support
eliminating the Names Council and restructuring the DNSO as a large Assembly
on the basis of one-man/one-vote?
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html