DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re[10]: [ga-sys] Registrants Charter - FREEDOMS - Part 1

AGAIN, you miss my point. Why is this so difficult. Having the options and
KNOWING about the options are two very different things. My suggestion AGAIN
is that Registrars or a third party be charged with making sure every
Registrant of a Domain Name knows their rights and options regarding a
domain name. Why is it you and ICANN both seem to resist any effort at
creating a more informed public?

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <ga-sys@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: Re[10]: [ga-sys] Registrants Charter - FREEDOMS - Part 1

> Hello NameCritic,
> Thursday, May 17, 2001, 1:38:43 PM, NameCritic wrote:
> > Not every website is a business. Need to realize that and keep it in
> > when discussing privacy. And as I said I prefer my info listed, but
> > those who don't wish their's displayed. The options should be offered to
> > every registrant of a domain name.
> And I said that :
> > You can always use one of those anonymous third level domain
> > registries.
> You responded that it was impractical to expect businesses to do that.
> For non-businesses, the options already discussed are available to
> them.
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net

This message was passed to you via the ga-sys@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-sys" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>