[ga-roots] illegal conduct
The following is a snip from a heading a combination of activities
thread in the GA list. The contracts are equaly compelling, for
Inhancing competition is mentioned some thirty
If you take the time to read these papers you will find that
there is no
doubt that the current arrangements between Versign and ICANN are
They are very illegal for a very good reason, regardless of your
opinions of the U.S., the control was turned over to ICANN on a
specific and often repeated promise that we the people who use
internet would be the authority by which decisions were made. (as
multilingual, outreach and education fanatic I note that it is
people of the world and three times mentioned outside the U.S.
I invite all to review the corporate papers of ICANN. You must
APA, for light reading. Mr. Auerbach's postings on California
Corporations Code is a must. The following is great reading and
no doubt as to the impropriety of the Versign-ICANN violations of
A DoC warning and advisory re: representativeness
The DoC IANA replacement contract.
The controlling CFR
Other Versign contract
The bypassing of Stakeholders
The fake before cessation
Afilias is Versign or worse a price fixing afiliation.
Well that does not include the White Paper or Vint Cerf's
of these goals in front of committees. But it also does not
aoutrageous statements made by the players.
In the same direction we trudge, but with different visions we
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html