Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business and Intellectual Property Constituency
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:41:49 -0400, you wrote:
>The history of the DNSO is replete with joint communiqués issued by the
>Business and Intellectual Property Constituency:
>1. BC-IPC Safeguards Precis (Sept.2000)
>2. Minimum safeguards for the introduction of new TLDs - a joint statement
>from the Business and Intellectual Property Constituencies (Sept. 2000)
>The Business Constituency website routinely posts remarks from the
>Intellectual Property Constituency such as, "IP Constituency Statement on
>Proposed ICANN/VeriSign Agreement".
>It is clear to even the most casual observer that the affinity between these
>two groups is such that we are essentially looking at two sides of the same
>coin. A merger of these two constituencies would seem to be indicated.
I must admit I can see almost no difference between them. I was
surprised to see on the WIPO site a submission from one of the BC reps
on the Names Council in his role as Chair of the European Trademark
Association (or similar).
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html