RE: [ga-review] Re: Individuals' Constituency
|> -----Original Message-----
|> On Behalf Of babybows.com
|> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:26 AM
|> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
|> Subject: [ga-review] Re: Individuals' Constituency
|> William makes a number of excellent points. The idea of a "catch all"
|> constituency is a brilliant concept, and is one that meshes well with
|> idea of the General Assembly as a potential constituency group.
I agree with the concept of a "catch all" constituency or the two that WX
suggests however I disagree with the concept of the GA becoming a
constituency. I would much prefer the GA to remain an open working group
for members and non-members of contituencies to join and participate.
There will always be Internet/DNS users who may not wish to be a member of
a constituency but may be willing to participate in the GA on an informal
basis and with limited commitment.
As it stands, a member of a constituency has a number of responsibilities,
including financial considerations. Not all players will wish to be a part
of such a structure.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html