[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599

Speaking as an advisor to WIPO in this process, I believe this
argument-from-authority is an argument we should reject. The WIPO report
should stand (or fall) on its merits.  Cf.

FWIW, I happen to think that the ADR (minus famous marks) is only a few
tweaks away from being an improvement over the status quo.  But these are
important tweaks.

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:
> The WIPO report studied this exact issue with a great deal more 
> expertise than is going to be found on this list.  Frankly, I don't 
> think that ICANN really has the option of ignoring it.  The basic 

A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                    -->   It's hot here.   <--