[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [discuss] Individual representation

Cool..... compared to Randy Dave Crocker sounds like a real gentleman....
Keep up the good work Randy...

>>>> Agreed.  It means the academic employees -- the academics (NOT the
>>>> "academic institutions") -- are disenfranchised. Which was my point and
>>>> Ellen's, and which neither of us seems to be able to put in terms you will
>>>> grok.
>>> i understand it.  but it is quite irrelevant.  the same applies to the isp
>>> employees, the commercial institution employees, ...
>> The interests of a university as an institution or the university as a
>> .edu name owner are wholly distinct from the interests of the academics
>> who are employees of the university. Why allow an administrator who cares
>> about .edu domain policy to participate, while leaving behind the
>> trademark experts from the law school, theoriticians from the school of
>> government, and the protocol experts from the engineering school, to but
>> a few obvious examples.
>> The point you're advocating is akin to taking the library and the
>> bookshelves, but leaving the books behind.
>we all think we're sooooo special and different.

The COOK Report on Internet            Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA  Exec summaries, glossary etc
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)           http://cookreport.com
cook@cookreport.com                    What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml