[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [discuss] Individual representation

OK. Maybe we are getting somewhere .

Can you now try to explain *why* in your opinion it is irrelevant?  Why is
the disenfranchisement of the very type of people who designed the
Internet "irrelevant" to the discussion of the flaws of a proposed
governance structure for "technical" issues (or more).

On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Randy Bush wrote:

> > Agreed.  It means the academic employees -- the academics (NOT the
> > "academic institutions") -- are disenfranchised. Which was my point and
> > Ellen's, and which neither of us seems to be able to put in terms you will
> > grok.
> i understand it.  but it is quite irrelevant.  the same applies to the isp
> employees, the commercial institution employees, ...
> some decades a friend in an ansi and iso committee used to have an attack
> walrus to eat red herrings.  i have always thought i should have bred it.
> randy

A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                    -->   It's hot here.   <--