[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [discuss] Individual representation
At 04:53 PM 6/27/99 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>Excuse me Randy, I have ALREADY made much action towards constructivism.
>You are coming to these efforts late so you may not know about it. My
Roeland, it's interesting that you are unaware of just how long and deeply
and continuously Randy has been involved in these activities. It
highlights a kind of provincialism that pervades many of the individual
discussion fora, each ignoring the others and then claiming that THEY are
the one true forum.
>problem is that I am no longer wanting to expend large amounts of
>efforts when the processes I work with keeps getting hi-jacked. This is
Indeed, hi-jacking is common. One cause, of course, is a set of people who
really like to focus on bashing one or another OTHER group, rather than
focus on the much more difficult task of hashing out constructive
details. Another is a set of people who like to spread fear, uncertainty,
doubt, and misinformation. Still more comes from folks with impressively
simplistic opinions -- and equally impressive rigidity to those views --
not surprisingly including a lack of experience with public decision
Most of the people in these different groups (except those who clearly push
the misinformation) believe they are being constructive.
They are wrong.
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:email@example.com>