[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] FW: Re: S. 705
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 03:22:34PM -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote:
> > In fact, Joop's attack on Dave and I was a pure matter of his
> > personal dislike,
> This is not correct.
Let me put it this way -- it is certainly my impression that Joop's
primary motivation was dislike. He called for my expulsion after
about 5 messages.
> The issue, as I recall, was whether your participation would be
> predicated on support for the idea of an individual constituency.
From my perspective, not the "issue", but the "excuse".
> Nothing personal about
> that. You may also recall that I and others spoke up against excluding you from the
> list. And correct me if I am wrong, but the end result was that you have not, in fact,
> been excluded from the list.
I have been "requested" to refrain from posting, by the list manager,
under threat that I will be removed if I don't "follow the rules".
> I would think that the people who *are* sure that an IDNO constituency needs to exist
> should be the ones to judge the legitimacy of an organization applying to ICANN for
> recognition as such.
I see. Thus, Jeff Williams should be the only one to judge the
legitimacy of a Jeff Williams constituency.
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
email@example.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain