DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Draft report version 7 - REQUEST FOR APPROVAL

as the Registrars rep to the Structure task force it is great to see your first ever comment to the TF list since it's start-up in October 2001. But please be specific in your complaint. Which of the two paragraphs which are described as "minority and other reports" do you have a problem with ?

The first one was from the non-commercial constituency and said they favour an at-large definition wider than domain name holders. I have not seen this view supported by other constituencies, so it seems reasonable to describe it as "minority".

The second one was the gTLD registries saying they wanted registry operator input into the formulation of at-large infrastructure support. This is outside of the TOR of the task force and specific to that constituency so seems reasonable to describe it as "other".
The views of your constituency on the body of the report are most welcome.
Philip Sheppard

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>