Re: RE: [council] gTLD CONSTITUENCY
1. Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org suppressed, not cross-posting rule.
2. Please do not sent endless lines (it is something related to the
profile of your computer), I cannot read it well, and to quote you
a special editing was necessary. You may see how it appears in:
I may understand that you are againts the dominating position of
VeriSign for .com/.org/.net. I might even sympatize with you on this.
But it does not preclude I disagree with majority of your comments.
BTW - receiving lesson from you about SRI and ccTLD registries
sounds a little strange ...
> Did you know that SRI, which proposed .GEO, ran the Internet
> root and all gTLDs for ten years before Network Solutions?
> On what basis do you exclude them from representation in a
> registry constituency?
They might have technical knowledge, but it is not sufficient.
They might have a lot of money, but it is not sufficient.
The issue is legitimacy.
They are not in the root.
By the way: how your reasonning deal with the would-be registries
willing to run a ccTLDs ?
Anybody applying to run .FR is just getting a seat at gTLD ?
> Question: if a new company wanted to enter the automobile market,
> should we give the decision to a council composed of General Motors,
> Toyota, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler?
Question: if a new European company wanted to print US dollar
banknotes, should we let them do ?