Re: [wg-review] Covering letter to WG-Review Report
Joanna Lane wrote:
> Issue 3:
> Inadequate and unfairly restricted access to DNSO mailing list
> servers and other communications tools/systems which allow
> easy and effective participation in the DNSO for all interested and
> useful parties and groups.
> Allocation of ICANN/DNSO resources to provide ongoing ML
> servers and/ or forum capability for new WGs and committees. A
> minimum of 6 should be made available immediately.
Is the number 6 an arbitrary or intentional determination?
Working Chair, WG Review
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html