Fw: [wg-review] Proposal draft (part 2)
----- Original Message -----
From: Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 6:19 PM
Subject: RE: [wg-review] Proposal draft (part 2)
Sotiris and others on the WG-Review,
I have a suggestion for the recommendation in for part 2. I think we should think carefully about the final sentences in the proposed recommendation. I am concerned about the propriety of suggesting that ANY part of ICANN -- be it a working group or otherwise -- be the immediate vehicle for organizing a self-organizing Individual Domain Name Holders constituency. One idea might be that we add a sentence stating our recommendation on what the mission and purpose of such a constituency would be and that we recommend that the BoD put out a notice that proposals for the constituency may be submitted. Then, it will be the job of individual domain name holders to self-organize and submit a proposal in a manner similar to the existing 7. What do you think?
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board immediately begin seeking proposals for the implementation and organization of an Individual’s Constituency. Such proposals are not to be sought from any existing ICANN organization or any other appointed committee/group, including but not limited to the NC and any present constituency within the GA.