Re: [wg-review] small immediate improvements to the NC
From: Joop Teernstra
> But full seats will take time. The NC asked for input on immediate
Joop, this report is not for the NC. This report is for the BoD.
Resolutions 01.28 & 01.29 were issued by the BoD, not the NC. The BoD is
seeking to reform the DNSO, not the NC.
> We have given them little on this score.
> Here is something that can be implemented immediately.
> The GA can have elections for Individuals' representatives on the NC, say,
> starting two weeks from now, as soon as the new Chairs are seated.
To what end, Joop? If they're not full seats, what's the point? Personally
speaking, I think the idea of "observer" status is like the proverbial
carrot being hung out before the donkey. I don't think it would be a good
idea to request/accept such a situation, it may be dragged out for a
prolonged period. The immediate need is for *full* representation,
individuals have been observing long enough. Also, the GA will not be the
body voting for the representatives of the Individual's Constituency ("IC").
The members of the IC will be voting.
> Huh? Is this not the report on immediate DNSO improvents that the NC
> to see before the 16th of april?
Again, this report was not requested by the NC, it is going directly to the
> Yes, it should be carefully noted, as Sotiris did already in part 2 , that
> the consensus of the WG would certainly not want to stop at permanent
> vote-less representatives.
I'm glad you concur. This is crucial.
Working Chair, WG Review
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html