ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] No interest in a coalition of DN holders constituencies


Joop,
That is certainly one approach, but resistance from entities, who cannot
foresee any possible benefit to themselves from a "clean slate" approach,
should not be misinterpreted as a precondition to the selection of documents
produced by members of WG-Review that are worthy of serious debate.

Here we have two basic models for comparison:- Option A) Improving the
existing structure - in which I would include creation of an Individual's
constituency and Option B) Structural Reform - in which I would include
Danny's proposal, amongst others.

Members should now take the time to do the same kind of comparatives
witnessed with the VeriSign agreements, then we can determine the relative
long terms merits of each.

I agree that time is a consideration, which is why WG-Review should not be
ceased on April 16th, but "we don't have time to do this" is simply not a
good enough reason to set aside any substantive document of quality that has
been put forward in compliance with all the rules.

Regards,
Joanna


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 6:09 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-review] No interest in a coalition of DN holders
constituencies


For transparency's sake....

Marilyn Cade let me know privately that she has no time to even think about
such a constituency. (!)
No one from either the BIZ or the non-commercial constituencies has shown
any interest in such a grand coalition.

Therefore, perhaps for now we better  forget about the coalition and focus
on the creation of an additional constituency for Individual Domain Name
Owners.




--Joop--
Former bootstrap of the CA/idno
       The Polling Booth
www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>